Police Need Warrant To Obtain WiFi Location Data, Privacy Activists Argue

Civil liberties and privacy advocates have taken the side of a convicted robber in Pennsylvania who says police abused their power by collecting data from a college WiFi network to tie him to the armed holdup of campus pot dealers.

In legal documents filed Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union and the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation sought to persuade the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that police at Moravian College in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, violated the U.S. Constitution when they failed to seek a warrant to obtain digital evidence in the form of campus WiFi traffic.

The case is a new front in the battle over the government’s expanding ability to use high-tech surveillance techniques to search for people near the scene of a crime and then document where those people have been.

Investigators asked the school’s information technology department to turn over a list of students who were logged on to the campus WiFi network in the dormitory where two masked men posing as campus police officers held up a pot dealer and his roommate at gunpoint around 2 a.m. on Feb. 2, 2017, taking $1,000 and a jar of marijuana.

That list included three people who did not live in the dorm: two women and Alkiohn Dunkins, a member of the college’s football team. Dunkins denied being at the dorm, but a student who lived next door told police that Dunkins had bragged about the heist. Dunkins’ lawyer accused police of conducting an illegal search for the WiFi logs, but a judge allowed the logs to be used as evidence. Dunkins was convicted at trial in September 2018 and sentenced to five to 10 years in prison.

Another lawyer representing Dunkins appealed the conviction, arguing in part that the WiFi logs had been illegally obtained. Again, the argument failed.

This time, Dunkins is making the claim to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. And he is now backed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s national and Pennsylvania offices, as well as the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Those three activist groups submitted a joint “friend of the court” brief on Monday saying the ability to use WiFi logs to identify people in a particular place and track their movements “poses a grave threat to privacy and constitutes a sweeping expansion of government power.”

The groups compared the search in the Dunkins case to “a search of every house in an area of a town — simply on the chance that the suspect might be located inside one.” The police violated the privacy not only of Dunkins but of the two women, the groups said. “The same investigative technique can reveal everyone present at a political gathering, a mental health center, or an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting,” they continued.

The group’s entry into the Dunkins case is part of a wider campaign to broaden judges’ interpretations of a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that police must obtain a warrant before asking telecommunications companies for records showing when someone’s mobile phone pinged cell towers. The court found that the data required judicial oversight because it could be used to conduct “near perfect surveillance” of a person’s travels.

Privacy groups have cited that 2018 ruling, Carpenter v. United States, to try to persuade judges to require warrants for other types of electronic surveillance, including real-time cellphone tracking, automated license plate readers, data collected by cars and video cameras positioned outside people’s homes.

Dunkins’ lawyer, Michael Diamondstein, also submitted a brief Monday arguing that the WiFi data was illegally obtained, calling it “an example of George Orwell’s art becoming reality.”

Prosecutors in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, where Dunkins was convicted, have said that a warrant was not needed because the WiFi request applied narrowly to a campus network and because all students, including Dunkins, agreed to a policy that allowed the college to collect and disclose their usage data.

An appellate court agreed, saying Dunkins had no expectation of privacy in using the WiFi network.

Richard Pepper, first deputy district attorney at the Northampton County District Attorney’s Office, said his office did not expect the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to expand upon the Carpenter ruling to include a WiFi search.

While Dunkins may have agreed to terms of service for the campus network, the ACLU’s filing also underscored similar circumstances for anyone who connects to a municipal or other publicly accessible network.

“Those who rely on public WiFi networks for connectivity are at even greater risk of surveillance because they may have few other options for Internet connectivity,” the ACLU wrote in its brief to the court.

Notable Cases

Pretrial Intervention Program That Accepted Ray Rice Is Rarely Granted

We were concerned that Mr. Rice would be treated more harshly because of his celebrity status. We are thankful that he was not. We are thankful that he was given the same treatment as anyone else in a similar situation.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice will be allowed to enter a program to avoid prosecution in an alleged assault of his now-wife. Upon successful completion of the program — which will be a minimum of one year — the third-degree charge of aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury would be dismissed. The arrest would remain on his record, but with no conviction.
Pretrial Intervention Program That Accepted Ray Rice Is Rarely Granted
Notable Cases

Pennsylvania and Maryland Prosecutors Drop Child Sex Abuse Cases After Diamondstein Cross Examination

“Michael Diamondstein is the best lawyer on Earth. He saved my life.”

- DT
DT had spent three years in jail and was facing lifetimes more for multiple counts of child rape in Pennsylvania and Maryland. But Michael Diamondstein’s thorough investigation and strategic cross-examination forced prosecutors to withdraw their case mid-jury trial.
Pennsylvania and Maryland Prosecutors Drop Child Sex Abuse Cases After Diamondstein Cross Examination
Notable Cases

Life Sentence Vacated After Decades in Prison

“The district attorney recognized the inequities in the case and we are thankful for the compassion and justice they decided was appropriate.”

- Michael Diamondstein
Mark Young had been serving a life sentence for what prosecutors say was his role as a coconspirator in a 1974 bar robbery that ended in the shooting death of a patron. The 67-year-old Young, who maintained his innocence for almost 50 years, is now slated to be released from prison after a negotiated guilty plea. The judge vacated Young’s previous conviction and sentence.
Life Sentence Vacated After Decades in Prison
Notable Cases

Michael J. Diamondstein Secures Client’s Release from Pennsylvania Prison after 37 Years

He took his first free breaths this afternoon after almost 40 years, and he is very happy and humbled.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
Willie Stokes's release comes after the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania vacated his murder conviction, concluding that the state violated Stokes's constitutional rights by "withholding" crucial evidence about the false testimony of a key witness in the case, according to court documents.
Michael J. Diamondstein Secures Client’s Release from Pennsylvania Prison after 37 Years
Notable Cases

Diamondstein Prevails on Murder Charge for Rapper

Mr. Diamondstein saved my life. He is the best there is.

- Monte Small Atwell aka Benjy
Despite that fact that multiple videos showed local rap singer, Monte Small Atwell aka Benjy killing the decedent, a Philadelphia jury found Mr. Atwell Not Guilty of Murder. The video clearly showed that the unarmed decedent was chasing Mr. Atwell. Mr. Atwell’s attorney, Michael Diamondstein litigated a very effective self-defense case. After a number of withering cross examinations and a closing wherein Mr. Diamondstein exhorted the jurors that his client “would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6” the jury agreed that Mr. Atwell’s actions were justified.
Diamondstein Prevails on Murder Charge for Rapper
Notable Cases

Six Narcotics Officers Acquitted in Federal Corruption Trial

The things that were said about these honorable men and police officers over the last eight to 10 months were ridiculous. A lot of people in this city owe these heroes an apology.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
Six members of an elite Philadelphia narcotics squad were acquitted of federal corruption charges – a verdict the men described as “vindication” after nearly a decade of federal scrutiny surrounding their conduct. A jury of six men and six women took 5 1/2 days to reject prosecutors’ arguments that former Officers Thomas Liciardello, Brian Reynolds, Michael Spicer, Perry Betts, Linwood Norman, and John Speiser routinely beat and robbed drug suspects during their time as members of the Narcotics Field Unit.
Six Narcotics Officers Acquitted in Federal Corruption Trial
Notable Cases

DA Seth Williams, in Federal Court, Pleads Not Guilty to Corruption Charges

This indictment is 24 hours old and yet too many politicians and commentators have already tried and convicted Seth Williams in the media. Simply because the government makes explosive allegations in a complaint doesn’t mean they’re going to prove it in a court of law.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams pleaded not guilty to 23 counts of fraud, extortion, and bribery-related charges. But the problems of the city’s cash-strapped top prosecutor continued to mount outside the courtroom, a day after federal authorities accused him of repeatedly selling his influence to wealthy benefactors willing to bankroll his luxury tastes.
DA Seth Williams, in Federal Court, Pleads Not Guilty to Corruption Charges
Notable Cases

When Your Freedom Is at Stake, You Need a Tenacious Litigator

The man gave me my life back.

- Yusef Bey
It's 8:00 on a September morning but Michael Diamonstein has already been in his office for hours. A criminal defense lawyer, Diamondstein likes to be prepared before he goes to court. That preparation paid off to get an innocent man cleared of all charges.
When Your Freedom Is at Stake, You Need a Tenacious Litigator
Notable Cases

DA’s Office Drops Murder Charges in North Philly Shooting

Tremendous day, not only for Mr. Hill but for the entire Philadelphia justice system.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
With evidence missing and the investigation tainted by the involvement of a detective who pleaded guilty to impeding justice, the District Attorney’s Office has withdrawn murder charges against a 28-year-old man, Dante Hill, in a 2011 shooting outside a North Philadelphia sports bar.
DA’s Office Drops Murder Charges in North Philly Shooting
Notable Cases

Exclusive: Claire Risoldi to Pay Less for Insurance Fraud Scheme, Still Hopes to Avoid Jail Time

Diamondstein added that Berks County Senior Judge Stephen Lieberman, who is now overseeing the case, has authority to reconsider the sentence made by the previous judge, who retired last year.

Michael Diamondstein argued the original jail sentence is illegal because the previous judge assigned the case failed to address if Risoldi was eligible for re-entry, which would allow her to be released from jail early.
Exclusive: Claire Risoldi to Pay Less for Insurance Fraud Scheme, Still Hopes to Avoid Jail Time
Notable Cases

Prosecution Failure Leads to Dismissal of Philadelphia Drug Cases

On behalf of Mr. Jordan, we are extremely happy that that the Superior Court upheld the sound decision of Judge Means.

- Michael J. Diamondstein
On October 10, 2014, the Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld a lower court’s ruling that by failing to provide the defense with a copy of police paperwork in a criminal case (Com. v. Jordan, T., 175 EDA 2014 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014 )), the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was barred from the evidence at trial.
Prosecution Failure Leads to Dismissal of Philadelphia Drug Cases